From a rational mind accustomed to linear-sequential thinking, called logical, the issue of organ transplantation falls within a common practice in order to save physical lives. For a long time, publicity campaigns have been carried out to raise awareness among the general population so that they can become future donors in favor of those patients who need an organ. In Fleck’s article (2022) he points out Spain as the country with the highest number of organ donors, followed by the United States and Portugal. Due to the decrease in donations in recent years, the Swiss have activated a law promoting an inclusive-exclusive transplant system (“opt-out”), i.e.: “when someone dies, by default their organs will be donated whenever possible, unless the person has specifically said otherwise. Family members may also refuse the process if they say the deceased person would not have wanted it.” (p.1). This raises a largely ethical question so Drs. Veatch and Ross (2015) clearly lay out the moral controversies facing society and the scientific community in dealing with organ transplantation. Multiple factors come into play here: religious, social, cultural, ultimately anthropological (the right to die has to be considered as the right to live). In addition to the large market involved in illegal organ trafficking, the death of donors, and the criteria to be used to prioritize one recipient over another. In addition to all this, the possible rejection of both the organ and the recipient must be taken into account. In the scientific journal Saludemia, we can find the article Transplants – In Depth – After transplantation (2022) where the form of rejection of the transplanted organ is explained: Hyperacute rejection ( occurs exceptionally in the same operation), acute rejection ( the immune system of the transplanted person does not accept the organ), chronic rejection ( takes longer to appear and the immune system progressively deteriorates the transplanted organ) and finally graft disease ( refers to the transplanted tissue not accepting the recipient).
A fundamental question that has been the subject of research in recent years is: what happens to the recipient on an emotional and psychological level when he/she receives the donated organ. The case of the actress Charlotte Valandrey, who received a heart transplant, is well known. In her book “The Unknown Heart” (2012) she recounts how she lived aspects of a life that was not her own, even falling in love with the husband of the donor. Matesanz is a Spanish nephrologist, founder and former director of the National Transplant Organization, opens the debate on The Soul of Organs (2019), ridiculing the possibility that transplanting an organ transfers the emotional and psychic burden of the donor. He completely contradicts the surgeon Caralps, who performed the first heart transplant in Spain in 1984, who states: “the heart is that organ “capable of transmitting certain memories of the donor”.
Within the physiological constitution of the human body we find the organs which fulfill vital functions without them physical life ends. Given the lack of preparation for death in mainly modern and industrialized societies and the fear of losing the physical body, immortality is desperately sought and for this we resort, in this case, to organ transplants.
We must keep in mind that each organ represents an energetic center that manages a main emotion. That is to say, the kidneys manage fear, the liver manages anger, the pancreas manages worry, the lungs manage sadness, the heart manages joy and happiness. If we
understand that the human being, besides being a physical and mental body, is an emotional body, then we understand that emotions and how these are experienced, directly affect both our psyche and all our vital organs.
It is well known that diseases manifest themselves when there has been a previously conscious or unconscious imbalance in the emotions, resulting in self-destructive thoughts that enhance the lowering of the immune system of the person. An unsatisfied and unbalanced life manifests the lack of health. Our memory is not only composed of circumstantial facts lived in the physical experience but also the feelings that we generate in these circumstances. This forms a conglomerate that remains as an energetic imprint imprinted in each cell of our body, regrouping and self-classifying in the competent organs of each emotion. At a much more subtle level is the soul, which we could say is the characteristic energetic imprint that differentiates one human being from another.
What happens when a person dies and a part of his or her physical body (the organ) is transferred to the living body of another person? According to science there are only two possibilities: either there is a successful transplant and acceptance of the organ in order to continue living or there is a rejection where the transplanted person finally dies. Things are not as simple as they seem. At the energetic level there is an invasion of one energetic field of consciousness with all its symbolic and emotional charge into another, or what is known as the transference of emotions and feelings between the donor and the recipient. To understand all this, one must leave prejudices aside and mental preconceptions to the other. There are many documented cases of people who have been transplanted and suddenly receive sensations, memories that are not part of their own experience of this life. Given the lack of information on this subject that has been classified as strange and therefore somewhat esoteric, the scientific community finds it easier to ignore or even deny it. Fortunately, many of us who are in the constant work of expanding our consciousness can clearly see that this so-called transference is not an isolated fact but a very common one.
So why do rejections occur from an energetic point of view? From a much broader perspective than that of science itself approved by social consensus, we understand that a rejection occurs when the energetic field of the receiver is diametrically opposed to that of the donor. In this case, incompatibility occurs.
The big question would be: how can we then avoid the emotional psychic burden that the recipient receives from the donor? The answer is not simple but let’s make it simple in order to understand. First of all, ideally, the recipient should have an open consciousness outside of pre-established thought patterns in order to prepare him or herself for the reception of an external organ. Unfortunately, this does not happen as often as it would be desirable, so I propose a technique of raising consciousness through which the recipient balances his mental-emotional and mainly energetic system to be prepared to receive the organ. Forgiveness, gratitude from the maximum honesty and sincerity are fundamental requirements to be able to accept the organ. Secondly, it is necessary to purify, balance and reprogram the organ before it is transplanted. Reprogramming has to do with the alignment with the recipient’s own energetic system. Thus, the differences in the energetic frequencies programmed in both the donor and the recipient must be worked on.
Finally and thirdly, a review must be done in a certain period of time (which is established according to the physiological, mental and emotional conditions of the recipient) to keep in balance the energetic system created from the fusion between the organ and its receptacle. Finally, I would like to express that I consider it absolutely vital to carry out this process in order to be grateful for the possibility of continuing a life of one’s own and not a borrowed one. The receiver with this work establishes his own personal power in the construction of his own destiny in freedom without burdens or the 3 of third parties. Each decision taken constitutes the canvas where to paint our own destiny. Choose yours where you can be the god creator of your own existence.
Fleck, A. (May 20, 2022). The Global Gulf in Organ Donation Rates. Statista. Doi:
https://www.statista.com/chart/27492/deceased-organ-donors-by-country/
Matesanz,R. (4 June 2019). The soul of organs. Medical Editor.
https://www.redaccionmedica.com/opinion/rafael-matesanz/el-alma-de-los-organos-4439
Ramirez,L. (2017). “Not a single cardiac surgeon congratulated us”: author of the first heart transplant in Spain: Jose María Caralps. In person. London. https://theobjective.com/further/cultura/2017-12-01/josep-ma-caralps-el-doctor-que-hizo-el-pr imer-trasplante-de-corazon-en-espana-ni-un-solo-cirujano-cardiaco-nos-felicito/
Transplantation – In Depth – After the transplant (2022). Saludemia.
https://www.saludemia.com/trasplantes/rechazo-de-trasplantes-de-organos-inmunosupresor es
Veatch, R. M., & Ross, L. F. (2015). Transplantation ethics. Georgetown University Press.
